April 22 (Bloomberg) - former Director Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Rajat Gupta, accused by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of leakage within the information society, seeks her dry dispute heard by us district judge in New York.
The SEC, in an administrative proceeding filed on March 1 in Washington, accuses Gupta, of giving information to co-founder of Galleon Group LLC Raj Rajaratnam on investment of 5 billion of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. of Goldman Sachs. The Agency supports also Gupta told Rajaratnam on quarterly profit of the Bank based in New York and those of & Procter Gamble Co., where Gupta is also the Director. Gupta has not been charged criminally.Gupta continued the SEC on March 18 before the Federal Court in Manhattan, denying the allegations in the SEC and arguing that it was the only one of more than two dozens of people related to the case of Galleon of the Government to have such an administrative procedure brought against him. He also argued that the allegations the SEC took place at least 1 1/2 years before regulatory agencies have been allowed to bring an action under the Dodd-Frank Act. "We have a constitutional issue here, lawyer Gupta, Gary Naftalis, said U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff, who presides over the trial Gupta. "This man, of all the defendants Galleon - 27 persons and eight companies - it is the only one who is appointed by the SEC for an administrative procedure,""Naftalis said yesterday."Business of the Courts'Naftalis has argued that, in the framework of the procedure for the SEC, Gupta will have access to the evidence collected by the SEC that must be submitted to a defendant in a civil suit. He also said Rakoff that an administrative law judge will be any first make a finding, and that a final decision is made by the Gupta dry. could appeal that after the SEC makes its findings, Naftalis said. "The Constitution is the business of the federal courts, said Naftalis. "What is the harm here?" The fact is that you need to go through an administrative procedure to defend your rights and who is wrong. "In SEC proceedings, the judge is authorized to examine by hearsay or evidence which may be indirect or speculative. Previously, Brenda Murray, j. main administrative law of the SEC, has refused to suspend the action of the commission and provided an administrative trial on 18 July for Gupta. "Good Process'Richard Humes, lawyer with the SEC, said yesterday that the federal courts have no jurisdiction in the dispute before any finding is made in its administrative action against Gupta. If there is a finding in the administrative procedure, Gupta must take any appeal directly to a Federal Court of appeal, Humes said. "Even if it is an error, the appropriate process is to take the appeal to the Court of appeal and to correct the situation, said Humes.Rakoff said it would make a decision later.Rajaratnam, 53, is the trial in Federal Court in Manhattan in the largest crackdown initiated of hedge funds in the history of the United States. Sri Lankan born Money Manager is accused of winning $ 63.8 million of Councils disclosed by insiders, including the Gupta. Rajaratnam denies wrongdoing, saying: he founded the research trades.The case is Gupta v. SEC, 11-cv-01900, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). The Rajaratnam case is U.S. v. Rajaratnam, 1: 09-cr-01184, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).-Editors: Michael Hytha, Peter Blumberg
To contact the reporter on this story: Patricia Hurtado New York to the pathurtado@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha to the mhytha@bloomberg.net
没有评论:
发表评论